CPR For The Soul 2005 v2.0 

“Resilience is a PATH, not an event!”

CASE STUDY using the CPR System Formula
 
1. From What To What Tension
  • Demonstrate your approach, design or arena of resilience
  • Show what is in inventory and what's required
    • you can use the resilient spiral worksheet
    • you can use the core resilience survey
    • or use any other from what to what design
    • use a mapping tool for visual effect
2. Discover what I value and what motivates me to value what I value
  • Identify those issues that are IMULL
    • Importance
    • Motivation
    • Urgency
    • Leverage
    • Low-Hanging Fruit
  • Identify a system of approach like OPTIMULL
    • OPPOR + unity
      • openings
      • possibilities
      • plans
      • outcomes
      • rightaction
    • PAAR
      • power
      • accountability
      • authority
      • responsibility
    • Tension
    • IMULL
  • Use your own system of value identification

3. Discover what others value
  • Identify through valuing how others values
  • Identify the method you used

4. Disclose your own values to yourself and others
  • Identify methods for accomplishing disclosure
  • Identify who you disclosed to:
    • coach
    • developmental team
    • leadership group

5. Accept yourself as you are
  • Identify ways that show personal acceptance and resilience and what it means to accept your limitations to both you and others

6. Accept others as they are
  • Identify ways to show how other acceptance promotes resilience.
  • Use specific examples
7. Map the system with an integral approach
  • Using some form of account-ability system, show how an approach using multiple perspectives is used to create additional leverage for resilience.
  • Identify the actual accounting system you used:
    • Survey
    • Assessment
    • ISIS
8. Inform through limitations, reform through strengths
  • Demonstrate the design and how it encompasses an approach where reliance on strengths is central to resilience.
  • Identify how you've closed the gaps presented by differences in capability and requirements.
9. Differentiate, then integrate
  • Identify how the "before" system can be differentiated into an "after" approach that allows a more complex, or more simplified yet, more integrated approach from the standpoint of strengths and core motivation, values or skills.
10. Add and apply the DNA Model to identify our actions.
  • Show how desires (capabilities) are integrated with needs (requirements), or means and ends are identified to create efficient design, actions and purposeful approaches.
After completing the case study email the completed case study in a MSWORD document to coach(at)leadwise.com
© 2005 CPR for the Soul